In a recent opinion piece for the Mexican newspaper El Universal, columnist José Carreño Carlón examines the aftermath of two hurricanes that recently struck Mexico, using them as a starting point to raise broader questions rather than offer easy answers.
The piece treats the storms less as isolated weather events and more as case studies in uncertainty—pointing to gaps in how such disasters are forecast, communicated, and understood by both officials and the public. Carreño Carlón’s column reads as a meditation on the limits of prediction and preparedness, suggesting that even with modern meteorological tools, hurricanes continue to surprise experts and catch communities off guard.
Rather than laying out a step-by-step account of damages or emergency response, the columnist frames the storms as symbols of the mysteries that persist around natural disasters in Mexico: how they are tracked, how warnings reach vulnerable populations, and how institutions respond once the skies clear. The tone is reflective and inquisitive, characteristic of opinion journalism that uses current events to probe larger institutional and scientific shortcomings.
Because the original column develops its argument through nuanced commentary and specific local references, readers interested in the full analysis—and the particular enigmas the author identifies—are encouraged to read the complete piece on El Universal’s website.
Source: Dos huracanes, muchos enigmas (eluniversal.com.mx).
Image: NASA Goddard Photo and Video, BY 2.0 (via Openverse).